[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations61703496
h-index2619
i10-index18176

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 30, Issue 4 (10-2022) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2022, 30(4): 27-38 Back to browse issues page
Impact of Policy-Making on the University Autonomy in Macro Medical Universities of Region Three
Mehdi Shabani1 , Saeed Saffarian Hamedani * 2, Reza Usefi saeedabadi3
1- Dept of Educational Management, Sari Branch Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
2- Dept of Educational Management, Sari Branch Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran , Snhrm3000@yahoo.com
3- Dept of Educational Sciences, Sari branch, Islamic Azad University, Sari, Iran
Abstract:   (656 Views)
Introduction: Policy making is one of the main and fundamental issues in the management of institutions and organizations which necessitates attention to its process and components. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the relationship between policy-making and university autonomy in macro medical universities of region 3.
Material & Methods: The present applied study was conducted with an integrated approach (qualitative and quantitative) in Ilam province of Iran, in 2021. The statistical population in the qualitative part consisted of the professors of macro medical universities in region 1 among whom 15 individuals were selected for designing the policy-making and university autonomy questionnaires using the purposive sampling method, considering the saturation law. In the quantitative part, 320 subjects were selected using a stratified random sampling method from managers and deputies of departments, faculties, department heads, and faculty members of macro medical universities in the health sector of region 3 to examine the relationship between variables. In the qualitative part, the questionnaires were designed and finalized through the Delphi method in two rounds, the experts’ opinions obtained through semi-structured 70-min interviews, and the review of topics and study of theoretical foundations. In the quantitative section, a researcher-made questionnaire on university policy-making and university autonomy was used for data collection. The SPSS and PLS software were used to analyze the data through confirmatory factor analysis and structural equations.
(Ethic code: 2084838744062451398162299017)
Findings: The results showed that among the various dimensions of policy-making, the component of “university structure” had the greatest impact with R2=0.927, and among the components of university independence, leadership independence had the most impact with R2=0.942 and path coefficient=0.971.
Discussion & Conclusion: Based on the path coefficients, a factor load of 0.644 was established between the two variables of policy-making and university autonomy which was above average and, therefore, significant. Moreover, since the t-statistic value of 16.247 was established out of the
(-2.58, 2.58) range, it can be concluded that the relationship between policy-making and university autonomy in macro medical universities in region 3 was positive and meaningful.

 
Keywords: Medical Sciences University, Policy-making, Region 3, University Autonomy
Full-Text [PDF 1620 kb]   (277 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2021/09/22 | Accepted: 2022/03/16 | Published: 2022/10/7
References
1. Williamson B. Making markets through digital platforms: Pearson, edu-business, and the (e) valuation of higher education. Critical Studies in Education 2021 ;62:50-66. doi.org/10.1080/ 17508487.2020.1737556
2. Brooks R. The construction of higher education students within national policy: a Cross-European comparison. Compare 2021 ;51:161-80. doi.org/ 10.1080/03057925.2019.1604118
3. Hamidifar F, Boroumandfar S, Masoudi M. Educational policy: process, topics and impact. Padina Publications.2021:p 95-110 (Persian)
4. Schofer E, Ramirez FO, Meyer JW. The societal consequences of higher education. Sociology Edu 2021;94:1-9. doi.org/10.1177/0038040720942912
5. Heidari A. Functions of Educational Policy-making in Education System. Public Policy 2020; 6: 261-79. (Persian) doi: 10.22059/jppolicy. 2020.76994
6. Pruvot EB, Estermann T. University autonomy in Europe III. The Scorecard. 2017:76.
7. Shabani M, Niaz azari K, Enayati T. Identifying dimensions of university autonomy in pursuit of transformation and innovation policies in medical sciences education. J Med Cultivation 2019; 28: 24-40(Persian).
8. Aqatabar Roudbari J, Agha Mirzaei T, Barimani K, Yousefi Saeedabadi R. The Study of Academic Independence Gap Based on University Experts. Educ Strategy Med Sci 2017; 10:334-44(Persian).
9. Golafshani A, Salehi M. Presenting a Model for Explaining the Effect of Visionary Leadership on the independence of the Macro Medical Universities of Iran in Region 1 Health Scheme. J Med Cultivation 2019; 28: 114-29 (Persian).
10. Emami GH, Salehi M. The Explanation and Grading of the Dimensions of University Autonomy with Reason Approach at Mazandaran Islamic Azad University. Edu Administration Res 2019; 11: 39-52.
11. Gallagher T. Governance and leadership in education policy making and school development in a divided society. School Leader Manage 2021;41:132-51. doi.org/10.1080/13632434.2021.1887116
12. Lingard B. The changing and complex entanglements of research and policy making in education: issues for environmental and sustainability education. Environ Edu Res 2021;27:498-512. doi.org/10.1080/13504622.2020.1752625
13. Pechmann P, Haase S. How policy makers employ the term quality in higher education policymaking. Scandinavian J Edu Res 2021:1-2. doi.org/10.1080/00313831.2020.1869081
14. Alves DC, Brito ML. Student permanence and university autonomy: The SiSU issue in the context of a state university in the interior of Bahia. Avaliação 2021;26:24-44. doi.org/10.1590/ S1414-40772021000100003
15. Bernasconi A. University autonomy and academic freedom: Contrasting Latin American and US perspectives. High Edu Govern Policy;2:5.
16. Duarte de Krummel M, Bautista-Vallejo JM, Hernández-Carrera RM, Espigares-Pinazo MJ. University autonomy as an educational problema. A historical orientation. Academo 2020;7:89-96. doi.org/10.30545/academo.2020.ene-jun.9.
17. Shaw MA. Public accountability versus academic independence: tensions of public higher education governance in Poland. Studies High Edu 2019;44:2235-48. doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2018.1483910
18. Mosleh Amirdehi H, Neyestani MR, Jahanian I. The role of external evaluation on upgrading the quality of higher education system: Babol University of Medical Sciences case. J Res Plan High Edu 2017; 22: 99-111(Persian).
19. Shirbaigi N, Abdolahzadeh N. Analysis of Educational Policy-Making Discourse in Iranian Higher Education System. Public Policy 2020; 6: 179-200. doi.10.22059/JPPOLICY.2020.77619 (Persian)
20. Ayoubain A, Nasiripour A, Tabibi SJ, Bahadori M. Identification and Prioritization of the Effective Factors on Evidence-Based Decision Making in the Health Policy of Iran. Iran J Health Insur 2019; 2:76-80(Persian).
21. Pourabbasi A, Emami-Razavi S, Kheiry Z, Naghavi Alhosseini S, Larijani B. Explaining the Position of the “Second Step of the Revolution Statement Among upper documents of the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Implementation of its Concepts in the Medical Education System. J Med Cultivation 2019; 28: 1-10 (Persian).
22. Mizrahi S. Performance funding and management in higher education: The autonomy paradox and failures in accountability. Public Perform Manage Rev 2021;44:294-320. doi.org/10.1080/15309576. 2020.1806087
23. Cunningham JA, Menter M. Transformative change in higher education: entrepreneurial universities and high-technology entrepre-neurship. Indus Innov 2021 ;28:343-64. doi.org/10.1080/ 13662716.2020.1763263
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: 2084838744062451398162299017



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Shabani M, Saffarian Hamedani S, Usefi saeedabadi R. Impact of Policy-Making on the University Autonomy in Macro Medical Universities of Region Three. J. Ilam Uni. Med. Sci. 2022; 30 (4) :27-38
URL: http://sjimu.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-7293-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 30, Issue 4 (10-2022) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.16 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4642