[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019

Search in website

Advanced Search
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
Registered in



:: Duties of reviewer ::
 | Post date: 2017/03/1 | 

Reviewing a manuscript written by a fellow scientist is a privilege. reviewers’ opinions of manuscripts are invaluable in helping Editor-in-Chief and Editorial Board in making their decisions. Peer-reviewing will help you keep up with the field and get new understandings that will improve the quality and value of your own studies. 
Reviewers’ Responsibilities
If JIUMS's Editor-in-Chief has invited you to review a manuscript, please consider the following:
-       Reviewing manuscript critically but constructively and preparing detailed comments about the manuscript to help authors improve their work
-       Providing all required information within established deadlines
-       Making recommendations to the editor regarding the suitability of the manuscript for publication in the journal
-       Declaring to the editor any potential conflicts of interest with respect to the authors or the content of a manuscript you are asked to review
-       Reporting possible research misconducts
-       Suggesting alternative reviewers in case you cannot review the manuscript for any reasons
-       Treating the manuscript as a confidential document
-       Not making any use of the work described in the manuscript
-       Not communicating directly with authors, if somehow you identify the authors
-       Not identifying yourself to authors
-       Not passing on the assigned manuscript to another reviewer
-       Ensuring that the manuscript is of high quality and original work
-     Informing the editor if you find the assigned manuscript is under consideration in any other publication to your knowledge

What Should be Checked While Reviewing a Manuscript?
-       Novelty
-       Scientific reliability
-       Originality
-       Valuable contribution to the science
-       Adding new aspects to the existed field of study
-       Ethical aspects
-       Structure of the article submitted and its relevance to authors’ guidelines
-       References provided to substantiate the content
-       Scientific misconduct

Peer-Review Process
As part of the peer-review process, JIUMS and all its reviewers abide to the confidentiality of manuscripts submitted to journal. In this regard, we do not share information about manuscripts, including whether they have been received and are under review, their content and status in the review process, criticism by reviewers, and their ultimate fate, to anyone other than the authors and reviewers. 
Each manuscript is sent to three or more reviewers in the process of blinded peer review. Peer reviewers will be asked to recommend whether a manuscript should be accepted, revised, or rejected.
How to Review a Manuscript via the JIMUS Portal?
the review process and to get access to the full text of manuscript, reviewers should login via the JIUMS portal then follow the instructions provided in below:
Please go to your profile--Reviewer Section--Pending Assignments--Click on the manuscript ID--Click on Manuscript Evaluation Form--Fill the form/attach the review file--Make the decision (Reviewer Recommendation) as to Accept, Minor Revisions, Major Revisions or Reject--Push "Send to Editor" button.

View: 4868 Time(s)   |   Print: 1128 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
Click here to see all texts in Reviewers Section topic.
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.14 seconds with 45 queries by YEKTAWEB 4646