[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations67894030
h-index2721
i10-index20397

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 29, Issue 3 (8-2021) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2021, 29(3): 12-25 Back to browse issues page
A Survey on the Observance rate of Research Ethics Principles in Approved Proposals at Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
Ali Ashraf Aivazi1 , Manijeh Hoseiny-Rad2 , Mojtaba Parsa * 3
1- Dept of Vector Biology & Management, School of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
2- Dept of Biology, Farhangian University, Tehran, Iran
3- Dept of Medical Ethics, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , mparsa@tums.ac.ir
Abstract:   (2177 Views)
Introduction: Considering the ever-increasing developments in medical research, especially the use of human subjects in research projects, the implementation of such research according to the ethical principles and criteria of creditable national and international declarations is of great significance. The present study aimed to investigate the rate of observance of research ethics in proposals approved at Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran,  from 2010 to 2016.
 
Materials & Methods: This descriptive-retrospective study evaluated 489 research proposals that had been approved between 2010 and 2016. Following that, the required information was extracted using six checklists prepared using the standard questionnaires of the Ethics Review Committee in World Health Organization (WHO/ERC) and other related studies. The obtained data were analyzed in SPSS software.
 
Findings: According to the results, 402 (82.2%) proposals observed the ethical consideration section. However, only 20 (4%) proposals were referred to the Research Ethics Committee and approved by the Research Ethics Committee. Furthermore, in 163 (57.8%) proposals, the subjects were informed of their participation in the study, and in 177 (36.2%) proposals, informed consent was included. In the proposals with human subjects, the confidentiality of the subjects' information in the research was predicted in 257 (52.6%) proposals.
 
Discussions & Conclusions: The ultimate goal of national/regional Research Ethics Committees is the improvement of the current situation and getting closer to the related standards, which totally showed a progressive trend. Holding educational workshops for honorable members of scientific boards as well as students, and careful supervision of ethics committees, especially in clinical trials and animal studies, is presented as a proposed optimization strategy to improve the ethical environment.
Keywords: Clinical trial, Proposals, Research ethics
Full-Text [PDF 476 kb]   (588 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: General
Received: 2020/12/28 | Accepted: 2021/05/10 | Published: 2021/09/1
References
1. Sadoughi M. [Ethical criteria in behavioral sciences research]. Metodol Sci Hum2011;17:98. (Persian)
2. Gomezvelasquez L, Gomez LN. Hospital clinical ethics committees. Acta Ortope Mexicana2007;21:161-4.
3. Eldessouky HF, Abdelaziz AM, Ibrahim C, Moni M, Abulfadl R, Silverman H. Knowledge awareness and attitudes about research ethics among dental faculty in the middle east a pilot study. Int J Dent2011; 2011:1-13. doi.10.1155/2011/694759
4. Larijani B, Zahedi F. [Medicine and modern medical ethics]. Iranian J Diabet Lip Dis 2005;4:1-11. (Persian)
5. Council for international organizations of medical sciences. International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. Bullet Med Eth 2002:17-23.
6. Aramesh K. A brief history of biomedical research ethics in Iran conflict of paradigms. Dev World Bio2015;15:107-12. doi.10.1111/dewb.12053
7. Anonymous. Human subjects' protection codes in medical science research. Health Care Ser Manage2018;1:1-10.
8. Hyder AA, Wali SA, Khan AN, Teoh NB, Kass NE, Dawson L. Ethical review of health research a perspective from developing country researchers. J Med Eth2004;30:68-72. doi.10.1136/jme.2002.001933
9. Abdur Rab M, Afzal M, Abouzeid A, Silverman H. Ethical practices for health research in the Eastern Mediterranean region of the World Health Organization a retrospective data analysis. Plos One 2008;3:2094. doi.10.1371/journal.pone.0002094
10. Farhadi Y, Musavijarahi A, Haghighi Z. Ethical standards in medical science research. 1th ed. Tehran National Cent Res Med Sci Publications2004; P. 26-7.
11. Zahedi F, Emamirazavi S, Larijani B. A two decade review of medical ethics in Iran. Iranian J Publ Health2009;38:40-6.
12. Larijani B, Rashidian A. [Medical ethics in a clinical trial a research in the theses of clinical trials in hospitals of Tehran University of medical sciences]. J Med Coun Islam Rep Iran1999;17:60-73. (Persian)
13. ZahedPasha Y, HassanjaniRoshan M, Riahi H. [Medical ethics in theses and clinical trials in Babol University of medical sciences 2001]. J Babol Uni Med Sci 2003;5:45-51. (Persian)
14. Larijani B. An introduction to ethics in medical research in the book of ethics in medical research. 1th ed. Baray Farda Publication 2002;P.231-48.
15. Imaz M, Eterafoskouei T, Najafi M. [Evaluation of pharmacy professional ethics in drugstores and its improvement strategies from the viewpoint of students and faculty members of Tabriz school of pharmacy]. J Med Eth His Med 2018;11:65-79. (Persian)
16. Ghasemzadeh N, Nikravanfard N, Rad R, Hossein M, Mousavipour S, Faramarzirazini F. [A survey on the rate of observance of research ethics in approved proposals at Urmia University of medical sciences 2003-08]. Iranian J Med Eth His Med2013;6:67-85. (Persian)
17. Fadaei F, Zahedi LN, Farahani Z, Ghasemzadeh N. [Review of the two version of declaration of Helsinki 2013 and 2008 challenges and changes]. J Med Eth Hist Med2016;9:75-92. (Persian)
18. Eftekharafzali M. Ethical observation in research in approved research projects of Kerman University of medical sciences during 1994-2005. Gene Med Thes Kerman Uni Med Sci 2005;24-39.
19. Ghodousi A, Esfahanian V, Razavi S, Ghaedifar A, Zamani Pozveh E. [Observance of national ethics codes of medical research in undergraduate doctoral dissertations in the faculty of dentistry islamic azad University Khorasgan branch in 2004-2009]. J Isfahan Dent Sch2012;7:737-44. (Persian)
20. Ghooi R. The nuremberg code a critique. Pers Clin Res 2011;2:72-6. doi.10.4103/2229-3485.80371
21. Ayatollahi M, Jafari P, Ghaem H. [An evaluation of the quality of published clinical trials in Iranian medical journals during 2001-04]. J Babol Uni Med Sci2005;7:64-70. (Persian)
22. Mohamdi T. Ethical considerations in student theses dissertations of Hormozgan University of medical sciences 2016. Hormozgan Uni Med Sci2016;2:21-6. (Persian)
23. Smith T. Principles ethics in research. 2th ed. Tehran Baray Farda Publication. 2006;P.123.
24. Oduro AR, Aborigo RA, Amugsi D, Anto F, Anyorigiya T, Atuguba F, et al. Understanding and retention of the informed consent process among parents in rural northern Ghana. BMC Med Eth2008;9:12. doi.10.1186/1472-6939-9-12
25. Adams P, Prakobtham S, Limphattharacharoen C, Vutikes P, Khusmith S, Pengsaa K, et al. Ethical considerations in malaria research proposal review empirical evidence from 114 proposals submitted to an ethics committee in Thailand. Malaria J2015;14:342. doi.10.1186/s12936-015-0854-5
26. Ingle DJ. Scientific and ethical responsibilities associated with the use and care of animals. Federation Proce1966;25:1465.
27. Ministry of health and medical education. Recipe for formulating ranking and describing the tasks of ethics committees in biomedical research. Tehran Min Health Med Edu2013; P. 30.
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA

Ethics code: IR.Medilam.REC.1396.5



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Aivazi A A, Hoseiny-Rad M, Parsa M. A Survey on the Observance rate of Research Ethics Principles in Approved Proposals at Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran. J. Ilam Uni. Med. Sci. 2021; 29 (3) :12-25
URL: http://sjimu.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-6925-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 29, Issue 3 (8-2021) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4666