[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations63033611
h-index2719
i10-index18679

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 25, Issue 6 (3-2018) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2018, 25(6): 150-159 Back to browse issues page
Risk Assessment Using William Fine Method at Ilam Gas Refinery in 2012
Hojatolla Kakaei1 , Abdolhosein Poornajaf2 , Zahra Kakaei3 , Farnaz Safarpour2 , Hossain Rezaei * 4
1- Dept of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- Dept of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
3- Dept of Public Health, Faculty of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran
4- Dept of Occupational Health, Faculty of Health, Ilam University of Medical Sciences, Ilam, Iran , rezaei2012@hotmail.com
Abstract:   (6984 Views)

Introduction: Industrial progress, development plans, and infrastructure projects, despite all the benefits and benefits that human beings have had, have been a source of fatalities, risks, and significant failures. Risk Assessment an organized and systematic approach to hazard identification and risk assessment for ranking decisions in order to reduce risk is partially acceptable. The purpose of this study was to identify the hazards in the Ilam gas refinery using   William Fein method which is a quantitative method.
 
Material & Methods: This descriptive-analytic epidemiologic study was conducted in Ilam gas refinery in 2012. The sample consisted of 9 units from 18 units of Ilam gas refinery which were randomly selected. In order to identify the risks, a team of representatives from the departments and departments of the present project conducted the projrect. In this document, the HSE-FO-001 (0) -90 hazard identification and risk assessment was also documented in units. This method evaluates and calculates the risks using the severity of the outcome, the probability of occurrence, and the exposure level.
 
Findings: In this study, 289 risks were identified, of which 5 (0.73%) risks at emergency level (urgent need for corrective actions), 40 risks (13.84%) at abnormal level (requiring consideration and attention Faster) and 244 risks (84.43%) at the level of natural risk (to be eliminated).
 
Discussion & Conclusions: The major dangers that threaten employees at the Ilam gas refinery are the risks of work at height and inhalation of sour gas containing hydrogen sulfide. Therefore, it is better to apply engineering measures in different units of the refinery  to reduce the level of risk.

Keywords: Risk assessment, William fine method, Gas refinery, Ilam
Full-Text [PDF 476 kb]   (10464 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research |
Received: 2015/01/20 | Accepted: 2016/10/25 | Published: 2018/03/14
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Kakaei H, Poornajaf A, kakaei Z, Safarpour F, Rezaei H. Risk Assessment Using William Fine Method at Ilam Gas Refinery in 2012. J. Ilam Uni. Med. Sci. 2018; 25 (6) :150-159
URL: http://sjimu.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-2458-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 25, Issue 6 (3-2018) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.2 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4643