[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations63123620
h-index2719
i10-index18679

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 23, Issue 4 (10-2015) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2015, 23(4): 53-62 Back to browse issues page
Comparing Results of Musculoskeletal Disorders Evaluation in Computer Users with CMDQ, RULA and ROSA Methods
Mohammad Sohrabi * 1, Amir Masoud Faridizad2 , Farhad Farasati3
1- Isfahan University of Art , ms.sohrabi@aui.ac.ir
2- Isfahan University of Art
3- Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (9227 Views)

Introduction: More than 60% of the office staff in developing countries complain about physical discomfort that many of the discomforts associated with musculoskeletal disorders. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among developing countries, according to the type and duration of work with computers, between 15 to 70% has been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate musculoskeletal disorders in computer users and determination of correlation between the results of CMDQ, RULA and ROSA methods.
 Materials & methods: Participants were 71 office users that were selected using systematic random sampling. The method used in this correlation study was using CMDQ questionnaire and evaluation of those methods.
 Findings: According to the final results of the RULA 46% of participants were in risk level 3 and 4 (ergonomic intervention) and results of the ROSA 21% as low risk, 48% as medium risk and 31% were at high risk. Also there is a significant relationship between the risk level of two method results (p<0.05).
Discussion & Conclusion: Two evaluation methods have a high correlation to estimated risk levels of musculoskeletal disorders and they can be used as an alternative method to assessment of ergonomic risk of office environments.

Keywords: MSDs, CMDQ, RULA, ROSA, Office staff
Full-Text [PDF 514 kb]   (2684 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health professionals
Received: 2014/10/28 | Accepted: 2015/02/14 | Published: 2015/10/10
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Sohrabi M, Faridizad A M, Farasati F. Comparing Results of Musculoskeletal Disorders Evaluation in Computer Users with CMDQ, RULA and ROSA Methods. J. Ilam Uni. Med. Sci. 2015; 23 (4) :53-62
URL: http://sjimu.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-2236-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 4 (10-2015) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4646