|
|
|
 |
Search published articles |
 |
|
Showing 3 results for Arjmand
- Keivan Kakabraee, - Arjmandnia, - Golam Ali Afroz, - , ,
Volume 21, Issue 3 (8-2013)
Abstract
Background: Biological characteristics of the parents (height, age, nutrition, history of disease, drugs and substances abuse, blood groups and duration of pregnancy) have fundamental role in the birth of handicapped children. This study aimed to comparison of biological characteristics between parents with more than one exceptional child and parents with more than one normal child in Region of Urban and Rural Kermanshah.
Methods: in this Ex Post Facto research, 800 parents (400 parents with more than one exceptional children and 400 parents with more than one normal children),that were selected by random sampling and multi-stage sampling , responded the Checklist that has made by researcher (Afroz, 2008). Data was analyzed using SPSS, t-test, ChI test.
Results: The finding indicated that there are significant difference (p< 0/01) between father,s age, mother,s age, mother,s age at marriage, duration of pregnancy,good nutrition, history of disease, drugs and substances abuse, blood groups in two study groups. But there are no significant difference (p< 0/01) between mother,s age at birth child and mother's height in the two study groups.
Conclusion: this study showed that there are difference between Biological characteristics of the parents with more than one exceptional child and Biological characteristics parents with more than one normal child. Therefore, recognition this damage factore can be prevented from occurring handicapps and influence to psychological health and wellbeing of the society.
(ph.d. Stu) Homayoon Haroon Rashidi, Ph.d Ali Akbar Arjmandniya, Ph.d Gholam Ali Afrooz, Ph.d Qumars Beshlideh,
Volume 21, Issue 7 (2-2014)
Abstract
Introduction: low birth weight is one of the important sanitary indices in evaluating the prenatal care all over the world. So, recognition of risky factor related to low birth weight can help prevent the occurrence of being low birth weight. The purpose of this research is comparison of psychological distress of low birth weight – newborns, mothers with those of normal weight- newborns’ counterparts.
Materials and Methods: In this causal-comparative study, first, all newborn babies in hospitals and maternity centers Khuzestan between Farwardin (May.2012) and Esfand (March.2013) were selected. Then, 100 low birth weight babies and 100 normal weight babies were randomly selected along with their mothers who filled the Depression‚ Anxiety and Stress Scales (DASS- 21) with 0/82 reliability. the results are compared using t-test.
Results: there was a significant difference between the mothers of the two groups in Depression‚ Anxiety and Stress (p<0/ 001).
Conclusion: recognition of some risk factors pertaining of low birth weight province can help take preventive measures to reduce its rate. the results of research were discussed, and research limitation and suggestions were presented.
S Moosavi, A Arjmand, S Kaboudi,
Volume 22, Issue 2 (6-2014)
Abstract
Background: Due to the importance of taking care of patients admitted to the treatment centers, especially ICU, the provided care should be commensurate with the severity of disease. Using APACHE II (Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II) standard scoring for determining severity of the disease and comparing it with other therapeutic centers is necessary. The aim of this study was to determine the mortality rate of patients admitted to trauma ICU with different APACHE II scores.
Methods and methods: This descriptive and retrospective study was performed in 6 month period from March to Sep 2011 in trauma ICU ward of Shahid Beheshti Hospital of Qom. Overall admitted patients were 140 and data was obtained from 110 patients with complete data and special data sheet of APACHE II Scoring system was performed for them. Data sheet were prepared for all patient and at the end of sheet, total scoring was recorded.
Results: Out of 110 patients, 80 (73%) were male and 25(27%) were female. Mortality and viability in these two group was 25(22.7%) and 85(77.3%) respectively. Eight percent of 75 (68.2%) patients with scoring below 15 died and in 20(18.2%) patients with scoring 20-30, 12(60%) died and 8 patients survived. Of the patients with scoring number 16-19, mortality rate was 6(42.9%) and survival was 8 (57.1%). In comparison with standard scoring system, in our study mortality rate in scores below 19 was lower than standard, but with scores above 20, mortality rate was 25% higher than the standard system.
Conclusion: APACHE II scoring system can be useful in trauma ICU and in greater scoring numbers, severe intensive care must be considered for ICU patient.
|
|
