[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations63163624
h-index2719
i10-index18678

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 27, Issue 1 (4-2019) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2019, 27(1): 44-54 Back to browse issues page
Effect of Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)on the Strength and Endurance performance of Healthy Collegiate Subjects
Sirous Nazari pirdoosti1 , Vahid Valipour dehnou * 2, Ehsan Gharamanlou3
1- Dept of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran
2- Dept of Sports Sciences, Faculty of Literature and Human Sciences, Lorestan University, Khorramabad, Iran , valipour114@yahoo.com
3- Health and Human Sciences College, Charles Darwin University, Darwin, Northern Territory, Australia
Abstract:   (3857 Views)
Introduction: Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a non-invasive technique used to modify the activity of the cortex of the brain. This form of current is capable of inducing changes in the electrical activity inside and outside of the neurons, which leads to a change in the resting membrane potential and thus improves the efficiency of the neural synapse. Therefore, the aim of this study was to investigate the effect of tDCS over motor cortex on strength and endurance performance of healthy collegiate subjects.
 
Materials & Methods: In total, 10 young and healthy male subjects (age range: 21.23±1.41 year) voluntarily participated in this study. One-repetition maximum (1 RM) of knee extension and anthropometric measurements were determined on the first session. In the next session, the subjects performed 4 sets with 90% of 1 RM to exhaustion for right knee extensors on the leg extension. In the other session, 3 sets with 70% of 1 RM to exhaustion for the right elbow flexors was performed with an interval of 72 h on the preacher curl machine. The rest time between the turns in the activity of the knee-lowering muscles and elbow flexing of the elbows was 3 min and 90 sec, respectively. Meanwhile, the electrical activity of the involved muscles and the number of repetitions performed in each set were recorded in this study. Immediately after performing all sets, anodal stimulation (2 mA for 15 min) and sham (2 mA for 15 min, which was interrupted after 30 sec) were used in two sessions in a randomized cross-over design over cranium of the subjects. The electrodes (anode and reference) were connected to a constant current excitation device with a maximum of 10 mA. Immediately after applying tDCS, the subjects again performed the initial tests, and the electrical activity of the involved muscles and the number of repetitions were re-recorded in each set. The electromyography signal amplitude data were collected using a 2000 Hz electromyography device. Data were analyzed using ANCOVA. P-value less than 0.05 were regarded statistically significant. Ethics code: IR.LUMS.REC.1396.303
 
Findings:  The results showed a significant difference within the two stimulation methods regarding the number of repetitions and the volume of work performed in the strength training session (P=0.001). However, there was no significant difference within the two stimulation methods in terms of the number of repetitions and the volume of work performed in the endurance training session (P>0.05). Moreover, no significant difference was observed within the two stimulation methods regarding the electrical activity of rectus femoris (P=0.197), vastus lateralis (P=0.363), vastus medialis (P=0.227), and biceps brachialis (P=0.078) muscles before and after the treatment.
 
Discussion & conclusions: The results of this study indicate that an anodal tDCS stimulation session leads to an increase in the strength of the knee extensor muscles. However, it has no effect on the endurance performance of elbow flexors which may result from the electrode montage in this study. Moreover, an anodal tDCS stimulation session has no significant effect on the muscular electrical activity during performing strength and endurance activities.
 
Keywords: Electromyography, Fatigue, Muscular endurance, Muscular strength, Transcranial direct current stimulation
Full-Text [PDF 778 kb]   (1426 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable |
Received: 2018/10/8 | Accepted: 2019/01/12 | Published: 2019/04/15
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nazari pirdoosti S, Valipour dehnou V, Gharamanlou E. Effect of Motor Cortex Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS)on the Strength and Endurance performance of Healthy Collegiate Subjects . J. Ilam Uni. Med. Sci. 2019; 27 (1) :44-54
URL: http://sjimu.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-5236-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 27, Issue 1 (4-2019) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 40 queries by YEKTAWEB 4646