:: Volume 23, Issue 4 (10-2015) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2015, 23(4): 53-62 Back to browse issues page
Comparing Results of Musculoskeletal Disorders Evaluation in Computer Users with CMDQ, RULA and ROSA Methods
Mohammad Sohrabi * 1, Amir Masoud Faridizad2 , Farhad Farasati3
1- Isfahan University of Art , ms.sohrabi@aui.ac.ir
2- Isfahan University of Art
3- Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (9309 Views)

Introduction: More than 60% of the office staff in developing countries complain about physical discomfort that many of the discomforts associated with musculoskeletal disorders. The prevalence of musculoskeletal disorders among developing countries, according to the type and duration of work with computers, between 15 to 70% has been reported. The aim of this study was to evaluate musculoskeletal disorders in computer users and determination of correlation between the results of CMDQ, RULA and ROSA methods.
 Materials & methods: Participants were 71 office users that were selected using systematic random sampling. The method used in this correlation study was using CMDQ questionnaire and evaluation of those methods.
 Findings: According to the final results of the RULA 46% of participants were in risk level 3 and 4 (ergonomic intervention) and results of the ROSA 21% as low risk, 48% as medium risk and 31% were at high risk. Also there is a significant relationship between the risk level of two method results (p<0.05).
Discussion & Conclusion: Two evaluation methods have a high correlation to estimated risk levels of musculoskeletal disorders and they can be used as an alternative method to assessment of ergonomic risk of office environments.

Keywords: MSDs, CMDQ, RULA, ROSA, Office staff
Full-Text [PDF 514 kb]   (2701 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Health professionals
Received: 2014/10/28 | Accepted: 2015/02/14 | Published: 2015/10/10


XML   Persian Abstract   Print



Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 4 (10-2015) Back to browse issues page