|
1. Moxham BJ, Shaw H, Crowson R, Plaisant O. The future of clinical anatomy. Eur J Anat. 2011;15:29-46. 2. Leung BC, Williams M, Horton C, Cosker TD. Modernising anatomy teaching: Which resources do students rely on? J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2020;7:2382120520955156. doi: 10.1177/2382120520955156. 3. Ang ET, Chan JM, Gopal V, Li Shia N. Gamifying anatomy education. Clin Anat. 2018;31:997-1005. doi: 10.1002/ca.23249. 4. Heptonstall N, Ali T, Mankad K. Integrating radiology and anatomy teaching in medical education in the UK—the evidence, current trends, and future scope. Acad Radiol. 2016;23:521-6. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2015.12.010. 5. Drake RL, McBride JM, Lachman N, Pawlina WJAse. Medical education in the anatomical sciences: The winds of change continue to blow. Anat Sci Educ. 2009;2:253-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.117. 6. Bergman EM, Verheijen IW, Scherpbier AJ, Van der Vleuten CP, De Bruin ABJCA. Influences on anatomical knowledge: The complete arguments. Clin Anat. 2014;27:296-303. doi: 10.1002/ca.22341. 7. Yammine K, Violato CJAse. A meta‐analysis of the educational effectiveness of three‐dimensional visualization technologies in teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2015;8:525-38. doi: 10.1002/ase.1510. 8. Bartoletti-Stella A, Gatta V, Mariani GA, Gobbi P, Falconi M, Manzoli L, et al. Three-dimensional virtual anatomy as a new approach for medical student’s learning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:13247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413247. 9. Mathiowetz V, Yu CH, Quake‐Rapp C. Comparison of a gross anatomy laboratory to online anatomy software for teaching anatomy. Anat Sci Educ. 2016;9:52-9. doi: 10.1002/ase.1528. 10. Bartoletti-Stella A, Gatta V, Mariani GA, Gobbi P, Falconi M, Manzoli L, et al. Three-dimensional virtual anatomy as a new approach for medical student’s learning. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021;18:13247. doi: 10.3390/ijerph182413247. 11. Duraes M, Akkari M, Jeandel C, Moreno B, Subsol G, Duflos C, et al. Dynamic three‐dimensional virtual environment to improve learning of anatomical structures. Anat Sci Educ. 2022;15:754-64. doi: 10.1002/ase.2158. 12. Tenaw BJIJAV. Teaching gross anatomy: Anatomage table as an innovative line of attack. IJAV 2020;13:76-9. 13. Bharati A, Rani V. A study on student perception of virtual dissection table (Anatomage) at GSL Medical College, Rajahmundry. Aca Anat Int2018;4. 14. Anand MK, Singel TJIJCAP. A comparative study of learning with “anatomage” virtual dissection table versus traditional dissection method in neuroanatomy. Indian J Clin Anat Physiol 2017;4:177-80. 15. Metzler R, Stein D, Tetzlaff R, Bruckner T, Meinzer H-P, Büchler MW, et al. Teaching on three-dimensional presentation does not improve the understanding of according CT images: a randomized controlled study. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24:140-8. doi: 10.1080/10401334.2012.664963. 16. Cicerchia G, Lumpkins K, Puche ACJERI. Assessment of Anatomy Education Teaching Modalities before and during COVID‐19 in US Medical Schools. Educ Res Int 2023;2023:2108105. doi:10.1155/2023/2108105. 17. Custer TM, Michael KJJoT, Simulation. The utilization of the anatomage virtual dissection table in the education of imaging science students. IJTS 2015;1. doi: 10.4172/jts.1000102. 18. Martín JG, Mora CD, Henche SAJBJSTR. Possibilities for the use of Anatomage (the anatomical real body-size table) for teaching and learning anatomy with the students. Biomed J Sci Tech Res. 2018;4:94. doi: 10.26717/BJSTR.MS.ID.001094. 19. Alasmari WAJAime, practice. Medical students’ feedback of applying the virtual dissection table (anatomage) in learning anatomy: a cross-sectional descriptive study. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2021:1303-7. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S324520. 20. Brown J, Stonelake S, Anderson W, Abdulla M, Toms C, Farfus A, et al. MEDICAL STUDENT PERCEPTION OF ANATOMAGE–A 3D INTERACTIVE ANATOMY DISSECTION TABLE: 0938. Int J Surg 2015;23:S17-S8. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.07.053. 21. Washmuth NB, Cahoon T, Tuggle K, Hunsinger RNJHPE. Virtual dissection: alternative to cadaveric dissection for a pregnant nurse anesthesia student. Health Prof Educ. 2020;6:247-55. doi:10.1016/j.hpe.2019.11.001.
|
