|
1. Besharati F, Hazavehei SMM, Moeini B, Moghimbeigi A. Effect of educational interventions based on theory of planned behavior (TPB) in selecting delivery mode among pregnant women referred to Rasht health centers. J Zanjan Univ Med Sci Health Serv 2012; 19:94-106. doi: JR_ZUMS-19-77_010. 2. Lobel M, DeLuca RS. Psychosocial sequelae of cesarean delivery: review and analysis of their causes and implications. Soc Sci Med 2007; 64:2272-84. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2007.02.028. 3. Abedian Z, Navaee M, Sani HJ, Ebrahimzadeh S. Comparing two instructional methods of role playing and lecture on primigravida females, decision about type of delivery. J Educ Health Promot 2017; 6:29. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_85_15. 4. Shakeri M, Mazloumzade S, Mohamaian F. Factors affecting the rate of cesarean section in Zanjan maternity hospitals in 2008. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2012; 20:98-104(persian). 5. Keshavarz M, Shariati M, Jahdi F. Effects of complementary therapies on pain and labor outcomes in nuliparous women referred to delivery unit in Fatemiyeh Hospital in Shahrood city (2003-2005). Med Sci J 2008; 18:245-50. (persian) 6. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev 1977; 84:191-215. doi: 10.1037//0033-295x.84.2.191. 7. Dai X, Dennis C-L. Translation and validation of the breastfeeding self-efficacy scale into Chinese. J Midwifery Womens Health 2003; 48:350-6. doi.org/10.1016/S1526-9523(03)00283-6. 8. Dennis C-L. Theoretical underpinnings of breastfeeding confidence: a self-efficacy framework. J Hum Lact 1999; 15:195-201. doi: 10.1177/089033449901500303. 9. Rajabi G. Validity and reliability evaluation of general self-efficacy scale (GSE1-10) in psychology students of training sciences and psychology faculty of Ahwaz Shahid ChamranUniversity and Marvdasht Azad University. New Thou Educ 2006;2: 111-22. 10. Schultz D. A history of modern psychology: Academic Press 2013. 11. Cwiek D, Grochans E, Sowińska-Gługiewicz I, Wysiecki P. Analysis of some pro-health behaviors of pregnant women after a childbirth education class. Wiad Lek 2004; 57:48-51. 12. Campero L, Hernández B, Osborne J, Morales S, Ludlow T, Muñoz C. Support from a prenatal instructor during childbirth is associated with reduced rates of caesarean section in a Mexican study. Midwifery 2004; 20:312-23. doi: 10.1016/j.midw.2004.04.002. 13. Bohren MA, Hofmeyr GJ, Sakala C, Fukuzawa RK, Cuthbert A. Continuous support for women during childbirth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017;7:CD003766. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003766.pub6. 14. Javad NM, Afshari P, Montazeri S, Latifi S. The effect of continuous labor support by accompanying person during labor process. Sci Med J 2008; 7. doi: 10.1186/s13584-019-0299-3 15. Khavandizadeh Aghdam S. The effect of the continuous labor support from a supportive companion on the process and outcomes of labor in primigravida. J Ardabil Univ Med Sci 2006; 6:368-73. 16. Rafiee Vardanjani L, Safdari Dahcheshmeh F. The effect of the presence of an attendant on anxiety and labor pain of primiparae referring to Hajar Hospital in Shahre Kurd. J Res Dev Nurs Midw 2012; 9:41-50. 17. Howharn C. Effects of childbirth preparation classes on self-efficacy in coping with labor pain in Thai primiparas: The University of Texas. Austin 2008. 18. James DK, Steer PJ, Weiner CP, Gonik B. High risk pregnancy e-book: Management options-expert consult: Elsevier Health Sciences 2010. 19. Dehcheshmeh FS, Salehian T, Parvin N. The effect of spouses’ educational classes held for primiparous women referring to Hajar hospital on their quality of life and pregnancy outcomes. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2014;19: S59. 20. Niaki MT, Behmanesh F, Mashmuli F, Azimi H. The Effect of Prenatal Group Education on Knowledge, Attitude and Selection of Delivery Type in Primiparous Women. Iran J Med Educ 2010;10,2. 21. Bagheri A, Masoodi-Alavi N, Abbaszade F. Effective factors for choosing the delivery method among the pregnant women in Kashan. Feyz 2012;16: 146-53. 22. Karim F, Ghazi A, Ali T, Aslam R, Afreen U, Farhat R. Trends and determinants of ceasarean section. J Surg Pak 2011; 16:1. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024654. 23. Ali Akbarei S, Jamalian R, Koahn S, Valaie N. Effect of childbirth preparation on reduction of pain and duration of delivery. Feyz 2000; 4:41-8. 24. Ip WY, Tang CS, Goggins WB. An educational intervention to improve women’s ability to cope with childbirth. J Clin Nurs 2009; 18:2125-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2008.02720.x. 25. Gao LL, Ip WY, Sun K. Validation of the short form of the chinese childbirth self‐efficacy inventory in Mainland China. Res Nurs Health 2011; 34:49-59. doi: 10.1002/nur.20400. 26. Hamzekhani M, Hamidzadeh A, Vasegh Rsf, Montazeri A. Effect of computerized educational program on self-efficacy of pregnant women to cope with childbirth. JKH 2014; 9:13-20. doi:10.22100/jkh. v9i1.407. 27. Aziken M, Omo-Aghoja L, Okonofua F. Perceptions and attitudes of pregnant women towards caesarean section in urban Nigeria. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2007 1; 86:42-7. doi: 10.1080/00016340600994950.
|
