[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2013
Citations541534
h-index99
i10-index66

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: peerReviewer ::
 | Post date: 2017/04/3 | 

All manuscript reports with scientific and effective novelty are considered for reviewing. At first, the formats, styles and scientific value of submitted manuscript are assessed by an editorial board. If the submitted manuscript was compatible with the guidelines of the journal, it would be sent to three qualified and specialized reviewers according to the topic of the manuscript; otherwise, it would be rejected or sent back to the corresponding author for necessary corrections.

  The names of authors and reviewers would be mutually double blinded .

Double-blind review
Both the reviewer and the author are anonymous. We keep authors and reviewer anonymity to any preventing reviewer fanaticism.However, the authors could offer reviewers for their manuscripts. The comments of reviewers along with the decision of editorial board are forwarded to the corresponding author. The final decision letter is sent to the corresponding author after that the reviewer's comments have been answered appropriately

View: 875 Time(s)   |   Print: 190 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
Click here to see all texts in peerReview-Process topic.
مجله علمی پزوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام scientific journal of ilam university of medical sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.206 seconds with 937 queries by yektaweb 3567