[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
Webmail::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2013
Citations608596
h-index99
i10-index88

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Ethical-Statement ::
 | Post date: 2017/03/1 | 

Publication decisions

Based on the policy of the Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences, the editor-in-chief entitles the editors to apply the necessary changes (e.g., removal of insults and copied texts as well as a lack of plagiarism) with regard to the legal requirements during the review process.

Fair assessment of articles

The editor should review the articles regardless of the authors’ race, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political orientation.

Confidentiality

The editor and staff writer should not disclose any information of the submitted article and transfer it only to the corresponding author, reviewers, consultants, editor, or publisher.

Disclosure of interests

The unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the written consent of the author.

Duties of reviewer

Contribution to editorial decisions

Reviewers should review the articles in accordance with the journal policy. They should communicate with the authors by leaving comments during the article review to help improve the manuscript.

Punctuality

Reviewers must review the articles without interruption. If it is not possible to review the manuscripts at the given time, they should inform the journal and announce their withdrawal from reviewing the manuscripts.

Confidentiality

Articles must be retained as confidential documents. The reviewers can only show the articles to the authorized editors.

Objective standards

The review should be real and explicit. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate and impermissible. Reviewers should express their views for the authors with reasoning.

Acknowledgment of sources

Reviewers must point out the published works of any relevance to the study that are not cited by the authors. Any statements that previously reported should be accompanied by relevant citations. The reviewer should also attend to any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Duties of authors

Report honestly, completely, and lack of plagiarism

The authors first explain the importance of research and the objectives of their study. The underlying data should be presented accurately and honestly in the paper according to the sources. Authors should cite the name of the sources they used with regard to observing the ethical issues and lack of plagiarism.

Authorship and responsibility of paper

All the individuals who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study as a co-worker or other positions should be listed as the authors of the paper. The authors’ contributions and affiliations should be stated. All the authors of the submitted article should be aware of and approve the publication of the manuscript.

Reporting standards

The authors first explain the importance of research and the objectives of their study. The underlying data should be presented accurately in the paper according to the sources. Authors should cite the name of the sources they used with regard to observing the ethical issues and avoid plagiarism.

Authorship responsibilities

All the individuals who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the study as a co-worker or other positions should be listed as the authors of the paper. The authors’ contributions and affiliations should be stated. All the authors of the submitted article should be aware of and approve the publication of the manuscript.

Responding to critique

After the review process, the author should apply the requested changes, and submit the raw data to the reviewer, if required.

Multiple or redundant publication

The author has no right to publish the same article in more than one journal or primary publication. Concurrent submission of the same manuscripts to more than one journal constitutes unethical publishing behavior, which is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of sources

Authors should appreciate the journals, resources, organizations, and individuals whose data and assistance they have used during their research.

Financial interest disclosure

The authors should disclose all the sources of financial supports affecting the research process and results in the study.

Main errors in publication

In a case of any discrepancy or error in the paper submitted to the journal, authors should inform it immediately and take action to remove or change the respective section.

View: 1532 Time(s)   |   Print: 278 Time(s)   |   Email: 0 Time(s)   |   0 Comment(s)
::
Click here to see all texts in Ethical Statement topic.
مجله علمی پزوهشی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام scientific journal of ilam university of medical sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.21 seconds with 43 queries by YEKTAWEB 3735