:: Volume 30, Issue 5 (12-2022) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2022, 30(5): 89-100 Back to browse issues page
Explaining the Effective Factors of Organizational Transparency in Strategic Decision-Making of Health System Managers: A Case Study: Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Iraj Khodadadi1 , Roya Shakeri * 2, Ardeshir Shiri3
1- Dept of Management, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran
2- Dept of Management, Sanandaj Branch, Islamic Azad University, Sanandaj, Iran , shakeri.roya@gmail.com
3- Dept of Management, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran
Abstract:   (807 Views)
Introduction: Transparency is a set of organizational practices that promotes good governance and democratic processes in the organization. If it is implemented in the organization, it improves the decision-making process and makes the process of organizational decisions constructive and effective. Therefore, this study aimed to explain the effective factors of transparency in the strategic decision-making of health system managers.
Material & Methods: This exploratory (qualitative-quantitative) study was conducted based on an applied research method. In the qualitative part, the statistical population includes managers and faculty members at Ilam University of Medical Sciences. The snowball method was used for sampling. Moreover, semi-structured interviews were used to collect information in this part. Based on the rule of theoretical saturation, 17 interviews were conducted. Furthermore, Grounded Theory was employed to analyze the data in the qualitative part. In the quantitative part, the purpose was the model testing designed in the qualitative part. Accordingly, a researcher-made questionnaire based on the qualitative model was used to collect the information in this part. The statistical population of the quantitative part of the research included 250 managers and faculty members of Ilam University of Medical Sciences. Structural equations and PLS (volume 2) software were used to investigate the relationships and effects of the components in the model.
(Ethic code: IR.IAU.SDJ.REC.1400.067)
Findings: According to the findings of the qualitative part, 27 concepts and 4 final components or indicators, (managers' responsibility, employee participation, moral values, as well as information and communication management) were identified during three stages of open, central, and selective coding. The findings of the quantitative part revealed that managers' responsibility (with a coefficient of 0.546 and t-value of 3.058), employee participation (with a coefficient of 0.548 and a t-value of 3.789), moral values (with a coefficient of 0.618 and a t-value of 3.019), as well as information and communication management (with a coefficient of 0.764 and a t-value of 3.76)  have a positive and significant relationship with organizational transparency.
Discussion & Conclusion: According to the research findings, it can be stated that the most effective factors in increasing organizational transparency in the strategic decision-making of health system managers of Ilam University of Medical Sciences are attention to information and communication management, institutionalization of moral values, employee participation, and managers' responsibility.
Keywords: Health service, Organizational transparency, Strategic decision making
Full-Text [PDF 1052 kb]   (360 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: General
Received: 2022/06/12 | Accepted: 2022/08/14 | Published: 2022/12/6
References
1. Brandsma GJ, Meijer A. Transparency and the efficiency of multi-actor decision-making processes: an empirical analysis of 244 decisions in the European :union:. Int Rev Adm Sci 2020; 88:1-18. doi:10.1177/0020852320936750.
2. Nai J, Kotha R. Transparency and Fairness in Organizational Decisions: An Experimental Investigation Using the Paired Ultimatum Game. Strategy Sci 2020; 5: 55-70. doi: 115.1177/0020852320936750.
3. de Fine Licht K, de Fine Licht J. (2020). Artificial intelligence, transparency, and public decision‑ making. Al Soc 2020;35: 917-26. doi.org/15. 1007/S00146-020-00960-w.
4. Gailmard S, Patty J. Giving Advice Versus Making Decisions: Transparency, Information, and Delegation. Political Sci Res Met 2019; 7: 471-88. doi:10.1017/psrm.2018.5.
5. HamedAli M, Sadq ZM, Ali Ibrahim S. The Role of Administrative Transparency in Achieving Organizational Health an Empirical Study of a Sample of Lecturers' Views at Koya University. Int Conf Account Bus Econ Politic ICABEP 2019; doi:15.23918/ICABEP2019P5.
6. Koseck S, Fung A. Does Transparency improve governace? Ann Rev politic sci 2014; 17: 65-87. doi:10.1016/j-ejor.2017.59.522.
7. Seyed Naghavi MA, Farahani F. Ccultivating Strategic fit and Organizational Transparency PromotionThrough Innovation Leadership Style. Manag Studies Develop Evol 2014; 23: 75-95.
8. Pavel J, Ochrana F. (2013). Analysis of the impact of Transparency, Corruption, Openness in Competition & Tender Procedures on Public Procurement in the Czech Republic. Cent Eur J Public Policy2013; 7: 114-34. doi:10.1177/ 2046147/12448580.
9. Michener G (2015). Policy Evaluation via Composite indexes: Qualitative Lessons from International transparency policy indexes. World Dev 2015; 74:184-96. doi:10.1080/01900692. 2019/636393.
10. Lee R, Joseph Rc (2013). An examination of web disclosure and organizational Transparency. Comput Hum Behav 2013; 29: 2218-24. doi: 10.1016/f.worldder.2015.04.
11. Kashef H, Taghvayee Yazdi M Presentation of Organizational Transparency Model in Relation to Empowerment for Establishing Organizational Trust of Managers (Case Study: Islamic Azad University of Mazandaran). J Res Edu Sys 2018;12: 111-30.
12. Karim F, Rehman O. Impact of job satisfaction, perceived organizational justice and employee empowerment on organizational commitment in semi-government organizations of Pakistan. J Bus Stud Q, 2012;3: 92-104. doi: 15.1016/j.cnb. 2013.0500017.
13. David FR. Strategic Management Concept and Cases. 13th ed. Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data 2007.
14. Grimmelikhuijsen S, Porumbescu G, Hong B, Im T. The effect of Transparency on trust in government: A cross-national comparative experiment. Public Adm Rev 2013; 73:575-86. doi:15.1111/Puar.12047.
15. Hanaysha J. Examining the Effects of employee empowerment, Teamwork, and employee training on organizational commitment. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 2016; 229:298-306 doi: 15.1016/j. Sbspro.2016.05.1627.
16. Zehir C, Çınar F, Şengül H. Role of stakeholder Participation between transparency and qualitative and qualitative Performance relations: An Application at Hospital Managements. Procedia Soc Behav Sci2016; 229:234-45. doi: 15.1016/j. sbspro.2014.510958.
17. Stevens JL, Spaid BI, Breazeale M, Esmark Jones CL. Timeliness, Transparency, and trust: A frame work for managing online customer complaints. Bus Horiz 2018;61: 375-84 doi: 10.1016/j. bushor.2018.01.007.
18. Holland D, Krause A, Provencher J, Seltzer T. Transparency tested: the influence of message features on Public Perceptions of organizational Transparency. Public Relat Rev 2018; 44:256-64 doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2017.12.002.
19. Rezazadeh F. Organizational transparency. Int Conf Modern Res Manag Indus Engine 2015.

Ethics code: IR.IAU.SDJ.REC.1400.067

XML   Persian Abstract   Print

Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 30, Issue 5 (12-2022) Back to browse issues page