|
1. Fawzy M, Emad M, Wilkinson J, Mansour R, Mahran A, Fetih A, et al. Triple arm trial of pH effect on live birth after ICSI in Egyptian IVF facilities protocol of a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Ope2020; 10:1-7. doi.10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034194. 2. Swain JE. Is there an optimal pH for culture media used in clinical IVF? Hum Rep Up2012; 18: 333-9. doi.10.1093/humupd/dmr053. 3. Will MA, Clark NA, Swain JE. Biological pH buffers in IVF help or hindrance to success. J Assist Rep Gen2011; 28: 711-24. doi.10.1007/s10815-011-9582-0. 4. Huang WD, Deb S, Seo YS, Rao S, Chiao M, Chiao JC. A passive radio frequency Ph sensing tag for wireless food-quality monitoring. IEEE Sen J 2011; 12: 487-95. doi. 10.1109/JSEN.2011.2107738. 5. Shah A, Chauhan OP. IT16 applications of bio-sensors in agri-food industry and mitigation of bio-threat paradigm. 2nd Int Sym Phys Technol Sen. 2015; P.7. doi.10.1109/ISPTS.2015.7220156. 6. Puchberger D, Krutzler C, Vellekoop MJ. Organically modified silicate film pH sensor for continuous wound monitoring. IEEE 2011; 12:14. doi.10.1109/ICSENS.2011.6127220. 7. Shorrock SM, Kun S, Peura RA, Dunn RM. Determination of a relationship between bacteria levels and tissue pH in wounds animal studies. IEEE 2019; 26:117-8. doi.10.1109/NEBC.2000.842407. 8. Farooqui MF, Shamim A. Low cost inkjet printer smart bandage for wireless monitoring of chronic wounds. Sci Rep 2016; 6:1-13. doi.10.1038/srep28949.
|
