[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
:: Main :: About :: Current Issue :: Archive :: Search :: Submit :: Contact ::
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
Publication Ethics::
Peer Review Process::
Indexing Databases::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Subscription::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Google Scholar Metrics

Citation Indices from GS

AllSince 2019
Citations62733583
h-index2719
i10-index18478

..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
Registered in

AWT IMAGE

AWT IMAGE

..
:: Volume 23, Issue 4 (10-2015) ::
Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences 2015, 23(4): 114-122 Back to browse issues page
A comparison Assessment between Diagnostic Value of Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Versus Hysteroscopic Uterine Findings in Infertile Patients who Reffered to IVF Department of Ahvaz Imam Khomeini Hospital During 2010
Roshan Nikbakht1 , Mojgan Barati1 , Alireza Sattari1 , Maryam Mohamdbeigi1 , Mahnaz Ziafat1 , Shahab aldin Sattari * 1
1- Ahvaz Jundishapur University of Medical Sciences
Abstract:   (7179 Views)

Introduction: Uterine pathology is the cause of infertility in 15% of infertile couples. Abnormalities of uterine cavity decrease fertility rate in patients who are undergoing IVF. Treatment of these abnormalities will improve fertility rate in these patients. Diagnostic evaluations of uterine cavity in infertile women are hystrerosalpingography and hysteroscopy. This study compared uterine findings in hysterosalpingography versus hysteroscopic in infertile patients.
Materials & methods: In this prospective descriptive epidemiological study, hysteroscopy uterine findings of 100 consecutive infertile women who referred to IVF unit of Imam Khomeini hospital in Ahvaz city compared with their hysterosalpingographic findings. These patients were candidate for hysteroscopy after hysterosalpingography. Analysis of findings was done by SPSS 16.0 and Windpipe 1.45.The concordance rate between two methods was assessed by kappa statistic.
 Findings: In this study, the results of uterine findings of HSG with hysteroscopy was compared. There was a sensitivity70%, specifity60%, false negative30%, false positive40%, positive predictive value80.3%, and negative predictive value46.2%. The agreement rate of the two methods was determined using kappa statistic which was 65%. (P-value < 0/005) our study showed that hysteroscopy increases 40% diagnostic power than HSG in uterine findings.(LR=1.4)
Discussion & Conclusion: Hysteroscopy is better than HSG from the point view of assessing uterine cavity lesions even when HSG was normal, the diagnostic power was increase 40%. Hysteroscopy can be easily performed, and with respect to the fact that HSG has lower sensitivity and higher false negative rate than hysteroscopy, we suggest that hysteroscopy should be the part of assessing infertile couples.

Keywords: Hysteroscopy, Hysterosalpingography, Infertility
Full-Text [PDF 437 kb]   (2238 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Applicable | Subject: departmet of gynecology and obstetrics
Received: 2014/06/4 | Accepted: 2014/10/26 | Published: 2015/10/20
Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA


XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nikbakht R, Barati M, sattari A, Mohamdbeigi M, Ziafat M, Sattari S A. A comparison Assessment between Diagnostic Value of Hysterosalpingography (HSG) Versus Hysteroscopic Uterine Findings in Infertile Patients who Reffered to IVF Department of Ahvaz Imam Khomeini Hospital During 2010. J. Ilam Uni. Med. Sci. 2015; 23 (4) :114-122
URL: http://sjimu.medilam.ac.ir/article-1-1856-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 23, Issue 4 (10-2015) Back to browse issues page
مجله دانشگاه علوم پزشکی ایلام Journal of Ilam University of Medical Sciences
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.15 seconds with 41 queries by YEKTAWEB 4643